Article

Long QT Syndrome Modelling with Cardiomyocytes Derived from Human-induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare: ReprintsWarehouse@springernature.com.

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit Copyright.com to start a request.

For author reprints, please email rob.barclay@radcliffe-group.com.

  • Views: 1

  • Likes: 0

  • Citations: 30

Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating

Abstract

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a potentially severe arrhythmogenic disorder, associated with a prolonged QT interval and sudden death, caused by mutations in key genes regulating cardiac electrophysiology. Current strategies to study LQTS in vitro include heterologous systems or animal models. Despite their value, the overwhelming power of genetic tools has exposed the many limitations of these technologies. In 2010, human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) revolutionised the field and allowed scientists to study in vitro some of the disease traits of LQTS on hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) from LQTS patients. In this concise review we present how the hiPSC technology has been used to model three main forms of LQTS and the severe form of LQTS associated with mutations in calmodulin. We also introduce some of the most recent challenges that must be tackled in the upcoming years to successfully shift hiPSC-CMs from powerful in vitro disease modelling tools into assets to improve risk stratification and clinical decision-making.

Keywords

Long QT syndrome, cardiac arrhythmias, stem cells, human-induced pluripotent stem cells, cardiomyocytes, precision medicine, life-threatening arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death,

Disclosure:The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Received:

Accepted:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2019.1.1

Acknowledgements:Maria-Christina Kotta for discussion and suggestions on the genetic aspects of LQTS. This work was supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017 No. 795209) to Luca Sala, and by the Leducq Foundation for Cardiovascular Research grant 18CVD05 “Towards Precision Medicine with Human iPSCs for Cardiac Channelopathies”. Pinuccia De Tomasi for expert editorial support.

Correspondence Details:Peter J Schwartz, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Via Pier Lombardo, 22, 20135 Milano, MI, Italy. E: peter.schwartz@unipv.it or p.schwartz@auxologico.it

Copyright Statement:

The copyright in this work belongs to Radcliffe Medical Media. Only articles clearly marked with the CC BY-NC logo are published with the Creative Commons by Attribution Licence. The CC BY-NC option was not available for Radcliffe journals before 1 January 2019. Articles marked ‘Open Access’ but not marked ‘CC BY-NC’ are made freely accessible at the time of publication but are subject to standard copyright law regarding reproduction and distribution. Permission is required for reuse of this content.

Long QT Syndrome

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a potentially severe arrhythmogenic disorder, affecting more than one in 2,000 people worldwide.1 It is characterised by a marked prolongation of the QT interval on the electrocardiogram and major cardiac events, such as syncope, cardiac arrest or sudden death, especially under conditions of physical or emotional stress.2,3 The current diagnostic criteria and options for effective management have been recently reviewed.4 As the first manifestation of the disease is frequently a lethal arrhythmic event, early diagnosis and therapy are extremely important and recent advances in genetics offer new opportunities.3 Besides its central role for the discovery of the molecular basis of LQTS and for the identification of the first gene-specific therapy, genetics became pivotal for the identification of the disease-causing genes and mutations in routine diagnostic practice and for gene-specific management.3–5 However, the low and variable penetrance exhibited by LQTS and the many confounding factors represent challenges to diagnosis and obstacles for the implementation of successful proactive treatments.6 In this context, multiple groups including ours have started to investigate and identify factors – either genetic, pharmacological or environmental – able to modify the clinical course of the disease by acting as modifiers of gene/protein function, expression or regulation.7 People with identical pathogenic mutations, even members of the same family, may display different degrees of clinical severity, symptoms or even be silent carriers of the mutation, which complicates the possibility of having unambiguous predictions of disease phenotypes simply based on the presence of disease-causing mutations in LQTS genes or when someone has a family history of the disease.7–12

Diagnosis of LQTS may also be hindered by the presence of uncharacterised rare variants; given that the pace by which modern genetic tools can extract huge amounts of information is unprecedented, the field is progressively accumulating a growing number of rare genetic variants associated with LQTS subpopulations; these, initially defined variants of unknown/uncertain significance (VUS), are variants short-listed in the genetic analysis but for which evidence of being benign or pathogenic does not allow to draw univocal conclusions.13,14

The complexity behind some of the puzzling LQTS clinical manifestations has still to be fully unveiled and this leaves many patients, who might need clinical attention during the course of their lives, undiagnosed and unprotected. Therapies should be personalised for these subjects, but current tools and knowledge do not allow sufficient predictivity or mutation-specific remedies. To study such a high complexity, the need for valid and reliable experimental models intensifies; traditional models as heterologous systems are incapable of completely recapitulating genetic and phenotypic features, while animal models, particularly in rodents, do have electrophysiological characteristics that are often species-specific and very different from humans.15 This hampers the possibility of promptly translating results obtained in vitro directly to the clinics, with significant delays occurring between the discovery of promising treatments and their clinical application. For all these reasons, new experimental models, more predictive of human physiology and less limited by costs and ethics, are required and cardiomyocytes (CMs) derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-CMs) have emerged in the past few years as a leading platform for these studies.

Almost 10 years after the first LQTS model with human iPSC-CMs (hiPSC-CMs) was published, we will briefly discuss the state of the art, some of the obstacles that need to be solved and the fascinating transition of hiPSC-CMs as precision medicine tools that are used to preliminarily investigate experimental therapies and guide pharmacological treatments.16 We will focus on the main forms of LQTS.

Human-induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

In 2006, Shinya Yamanaka and Kazutoshi Takahashi discovered that somatic cells could be reprogrammed to a pluripotent state by transfecting four factors – OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, cMYC – subsequently called Yamanaka factors.17,18 These reprogrammed cells, called iPSCs, can be derived from virtually anyone and represent an unprecedented source of human-based material that can be differentiated into multiple cell types through tailored differentiation protocols, including cardiomyogenic differentiation.19 Originally, iPSCs were derived from skin fibroblasts, which requires a biopsy, often difficult to propose for young children or to vulnerable subjects often already daunted by life-threatening diseases. Thus, new methods have been developed to obtain somatic cells from more accessible and less invasive tissues samples such as blood or urine.20,21

In addition to the obvious electrophysiological and molecular advantages of being of human origin, these cells share genotypes with their donors; this feature makes iPSCs candidate experimental models to study diseases of genetic origin, with LQTS and cardiac channelopathies being among the first to be reproduced with this technology. In 2010, the pioneering work of Alessandra Moretti et al., demonstrated that hiPSC-CMs could become powerful tools to study the functional effects of ion channel mutations identified in LQTS patients.16 However, as the molecular and functional characteristics of hiPSC-CMs are still far from those of adult CMs, multiple protocols were invented to promote their maturation.22 These strategies include the use of prolonged cultures, chemically-defined media, the generation of tridimensional structures tailored for electrical stimulation protocols or co-cultures of CMs with other relevant cell types.23–31 Overall, these experimental models are progressively improving and the techniques to study the phenotype of hiPSC-CMs have advanced in parallel.

Methods for the study of Long QT Syndrome with Human-induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

The in vitro investigation of LQTS has the primary endpoint to ascertain whether and how the CMs’ electrophysiology has been modified as a consequence of LQTS-causing gene mutations. The patch clamp technique is the reference platform of choice to precisely quantify the phenotype of hiPSC-CMs. Although limited by its low throughput and disruptiveness, patch clamp allows quantitative recordings of action potentials (AP) and ion currents; furthermore, the combination of real-time computational ion current simulations with in vitro experiments has merged in the dynamic clamp technique.32 Although not particularly new at the time hiPSC-CMs were first derived, it was embraced to compensate the intrinsically reduced inward rectifier potassium current (IK1) magnitude, typical of isolated hiPSC-CMs,33–35 with an artificial IK1 injected in real-time. This technique transforms the action potential (AP) of hiPSC-CMs into one with more mature features as greater upstroke velocity and the presence of the AP notch, allowing voltage-gated ion channels to properly work as they were in more physiological conditions; this proved particularly relevant to capture the electrophysiological alterations caused by LQTS pathogenic mutations.33,34

However, since the heart is a functional syncytium, measurements of the downstream effects of LQTS mutations have greater translational power when performed on multicellular networks. At sufficient density, hiPSC-CMs do form functional beating mono- or multilayered sheets, which can be scrutinised with the multielectrode array (MEA) technology. Originally developed to study neuronal circuits, MEAs have gained interest in recent years with the development of stem cell-based cardiac disease models.36 Furthermore, the MEA technology has also been defined as one of the platforms of choice in the context of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA), a task group which aims to identify the most suitable platform and protocols for drug screening and safety pharmacology.37

Other technologies with low invasiveness have been implemented as chemical or genetically-encoded voltage or calcium indicators, optogenetic actuators or imaging algorithms to investigate specific parameters of the diseased phenotype as a contraction and they all became widely used to obtain functional information with medium-high throughput.38–44

Long QT Syndrome Subtypes Studied with Human-induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Cardiomyocytes

As expected by the high prevalence in patients, the first three forms of LQTS are also those primarily modelled in vitro.1 However, other LQTS types have been identified and successfully reproduced with hiPSC-CMs (Figure 1); we will focus on these three main types and on the extremely severe forms related to mutations on the genes encoding for calmodulin (CaM). Common in vitro phenotypes across all LQTS subtypes include prolonged AP durations (APDs), measured with patch clamp or voltage-sensitive indicators, prolonged field potential (FP) durations (FPD) measured with MEAs or prolonged Ca2+ and contraction transients (Figure 2). Some of the cell lines also experienced arrhythmogenic events as delayed after depolarisations (DADs) and early after depolarisations (EADs) in baseline conditions or after a pharmacological challenge.36

Long QT Syndrome Type 1 and Jervell and Lange-Nielsen Syndrome

LQTS type 1 (LQT1) is the most prevalent form of congenital LQTS, accounting for approximately 40–55% of all cases and its heterozygous form, called Romano-Ward syndrome, was the first LQTS type to be recapitulated with hiPSC-CMs.45–48 The severe homozygous form, when associated with deafness, is defined as Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (JLNS).49,50 People with LQT1 and JLNS are affected by mutations in KCNQ1 that induce loss of functions in Kv7.1, an important potassium channel responsible for the slow delayed rectifier potassium current (IKs). Although IKs is not straightforward to record in hiPSC-CMs due to their limited cell capacitance, which reduces the total current density, and to a late IKs onset during CM development,51 partially mitigated by certain maturation strategies,25 in vitro models of LQT1/JLNS were able to recapitulate the pathological phenotype and exhibited marked reductions in IKs magnitude when compared to hiPSC-CMs from healthy donors or to isogenic controls52–54; detailed investigation of IKs with patch clamp also revealed the possibility for hiPSC-CMs to perfectly discriminate between homozygosity and heterozygosity.51–55 The similarities between hiPSC-CMs and clinical disease features extend also to triggers of arrhythmias; as previously described in humans, an increased activation of the sympathetic cascade is a clear arrhythmogenic trigger for LQT1/JLNS.56 When this is reproduced in vitro by stimulating hiPSC-CMs with beta-adrenergic agonists, their effect on L-type Ca2+ current outweighs the repolarisation capacity of the limited IKs magnitude available in LQT1/JLNS cells, leading to APD prolongation, abnormal Ca2+ transients and arrhythmogenic events (Figure 3).

Long QT Syndrome Type 2

LQTS type 2 (LQT2) is the second most common form of LQTS, accounting for 30–45% of cases.45 It is characterised by mutations in the KCNH2 gene, which encodes for the human ether a-go-go-related gene (hERG, Kv11.1), a potassium channel responsible for the rapid delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr), pivotal for the cardiac repolarisation phase.46 LQT2 mutations may induce loss of function in IKr through four main mechanisms.57 The in vitro phenotype in hiPSC-CMs is generally clear, with marked reductions in IKr coupled to consistent APD prolongation.58–68 Clinical LQT2 triggers of arrhythmias include sudden auditory stimuli or loud noises and while these cannot be properly mimicked in vitro, alternatives as a stimulation with positive inotropes, alone or in combination with IKs blockers, are a widely used strategy to exacerbate arrhythmias in these cells.56,69

Since the majority of LQT2 mutations affect IKr through defective protein trafficking with hERG channels incapable of maturing and reaching the CMs’ membrane, researchers have adopted several strategies to restore proper hERG expression or function.70 Some rescued the LQT2 phenotype with compounds able to increase the conductance of wild type hERGs, other with proteasome inhibitors59,61,67 or, more recently, through a drug repurposing strategy which promoted the maturation of mutant hERGs in vitro.58,62 This drug repurposing strategy was very rapidly translated to the two LQT2 patients whose iPSC-CMs were previously tested in vitro and proved that, besides the expected discrepancies between the clinical and in vitro conditions, the data obtained in patient-specific iPSC-CMs do offer a certain degree of predictivity in the clinical situation.71

Number of Human-induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines with Long QT Syndrome Mutations Published So Far in the Literature

Article image
Download

Long QT Syndrome Generates Prolongation of QT Interval at the ECG

Article image
Download

Effect of Beta-adrenergic Stimulation on Cardiomyocytes

Article image
Download

Long QT Syndrome Type 3

LQTS type 3 (LQT3) is the third most common form of LQTS, accounting for 5–13% of all congenital LQTS cases.45,46 It is the consequence of gain-of-function mutations in the SCN5A gene, leading to an increase in the cardiac sodium current (INa); different biophysical changes induced by LQT3 mutations may increase either the peak INa or also affect its late component(INa,L), the latter involved in electrophysiological abnormalities in multiple tissues, such as pancreatic beta-cells, cardiomyocytes or neurons.72,73 Despite INa overall current magnitude is lower in hiPSC-CMs compared with adult CMs and published hiPSC-CM models of LQT3 did correctly recapitulate increases in INa and other features of LQTS as EADs or prolonged calcium transients; APD was prolonged in the majority of models even though some authors described larger than ideal inter-line and inter-cell phenotypic variability.66,74–77 Furthermore, hiPSC-CMs with LQT3 mutations reproduced the expected effect of pharmacological therapies based on sodium channel blockers, which were able to rescue the prolonged APD and FPD and to suppress arrhythmogenic events in a dose-dependent way.74,76,78 Of note, some authors were also able to model through hiPSC-CMs some cardiac disorders with overlapping phenotypes of LQT3 and Brugada syndrome.75

Long QT Syndrome Type 14 and 15

LQTS types 14 (LQT14), 15 (LQT15), and the upcoming LQTS type 16 (LQT16), which is not yet officially approved, are characterised by mutations in one of the three genes (CALM1–3) encoding for CaM.79 Discovered by our group as associated with severe forms of LQTS and later investigated with hiPSC-CMs, these mutations impair the activity of CaM by either reducing its Ca2+-binding affinity or by altering its capacity to interact with downstream targets.33,80–82 Since CaM is a ubiquitous protein, present in CMs in limited pools, the consequences are dramatic, with very young people experiencing severe arrhythmias since birth and for whom current therapies are insufficient or inappropriate.83–85 These severe phenotypic characteristics have been perfectly captured by the hiPSC technology, with hiPSC-CMs from patients with CALM mutations exhibiting pathologically slowed ICaL Ca2+-dependent inactivation and massively prolonged APDs. A phenotypic rescue has been attempted in hiPSC-CMs through novel pharmacological or biotechnological strategies, with promising results that have already obtained preliminary translation to patients.33,81,82,86

Latest Challenges

The aforementioned disease models represent a good approximation of the clinical condition and have pushed scientists to explore potential applications for hiPSC-CMs. A few of the most recent challenges of the cardiac hiPSC field will be discussed below.

Data Variability and Gene Editing

The correlation between in vitro and in vivo data is still either uncharted territory or has resulted in contradictory findings in the literature. Although evidence has demonstrated that a fair correlation between clinical and in vitro recordings exists (i.e. LQTS cell lines generally do have prolonged APD/FPD in vitro), we still do not know precisely its extent and whether and how different reprogramming or maturation strategies could modify the magnitude and the time course of the in vitro equivalents of clinically relevant parameters as the QT interval or the RR interval. In the years since the application of hiPSC technology to disease modelling, it has become clear that cell lines from different donors have innate characteristics that are independent of the specific pathogenic mutation, thus they are likely to be associated with donor-specific characteristics.87,88

Electrophysiological properties as APD, which length should directly correlate with the presence of LQTS mutations, seem cell-line specific or differentiation-method specific rather than disease-specific and the same applies to FPD-RR relationships measured with MEAs; this can be attributed to potential confounding factors as manual pipetting, cell passage number and donor’s gender or ethnicity, suggesting the need of great care when data have to be interpreted on a translational perspective.62,88,89 In this vein, one of the most important additions in the LQTS field has been the concept of isogenic lines61; gene editing techniques, either based on zinc finger nucleases (ZFN), transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) or clustered regularly Interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9.90­–93 This technology can introduce pathogenic mutations, homozygous or heterozygous, into hiPSC lines from healthy donors, or correct them without altering the cell’s genetic background. This has proved to be important for introducing more robust standards to evaluate the functional consequences of point mutations and for precision medicine approaches.12,55,61,62,82,94,95

Precision Medicine

Genetics, hiPSCs and cellular electrophysiology are progressively providing better chances of tailoring therapies to the specific mutation of the patient, and it is clear that the partnership between clinical cardiologists and basic scientists can be very fruitful96. One of the biggest advantages of hiPSC-CMs is that they share their genetic background with patients. This link can be harnessed to correlate clinically relevant information as genetic data to in vitro physiological and pharmacological responses. Patients with similar characteristics can be clustered according to their phenotype or genetic data to obtain homogenous cohorts of people who share similar characteristics. HiPSC-CMs are generated from these subjects and subsequently screened with molecular and functional assays that are able to generate data of translational relevance. Gene editing tools are used here to validate the results in the presence of identical genetic backgrounds.95 This strategy may have important consequences for risk stratification and therapeutic responses, as patients with certain VUSs would ideally be given different drug dosages based on the preliminary results of the in vitro screenings in hiPSC-CMs.

In the context of precision medicine, the identification of novel clinical applications of drugs that have already received approval from regulatory agencies (drug repurposing) has increased. When combined with hiPSCs, it allows marketed drugs that are used to treat other disorders to be tested in vitro with a remarkable throughput on differentiated cells of human origin. In this view, our group has identified that lumacaftor (LUM), a compound currently prescribed for the treatment of specific mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, associated with defects trafficking in CFTR channels, could also rescue the disease phenotype in hiPSC-CMs derived from a specific class of people with LQT2 affected by hERG trafficking problems.58 Since LUM is already marketed for the treatment of cystic fibrosis in combination with ivacaftor and its safety profile is known, we were sufficiently confident to start a clinical trial.71 The mechanisms by which LUM may rescue hERG trafficking defects are still unknown and these results will require extensive confirmation from clinical data and from other hiPSC lines from more LQT2 donors to verify whether these effects could be cell-line- or mutation-specific or whether their mechanism could be exploited for broader applications.

Conclusion

hiPSC technology has brought significant contributions to the way LQTS and cardiac arrhythmias are modelled at preclinical level97; however, more efforts are required to offer an exhaustive comprehension of the translational relevance of hiPSC findings. In our view, shared and open protocols, tighter standards from researchers, journals, funding agencies as well as the implementation of large publicly available informatic tools and datasets are the sole way to revolutionise how the iPSC technology interacts with the clinics and shift hiPSC-CMs from useful in vitro preclinical tools to something able to produce relevant information for prompt clinical decision-making. It is also clear that genetics, combined with the most recent advances in hiPSC-CMs technology, bioinformatics and artificial intelligence, will unveil future possibilities and targets for the diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of LQTS.

Clinical Perspective

  • LQTS is a potentially lethal arrhythmogenic disorder that affects more than 1 in every 2,000 children. Our knowledge of genetics in LQTS has progressively increased over the years, and we reached a mismatch between the amount of genetic information available and the functional data that allow us to interpret this genetic information.
  • The emerging role of variants of unknown/uncertain significance (VUS) require in vitro experimental models capable of effectively integrating the genetic component and to extract predictive information relevant for clinical use.
  • Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes from LQTS patients, as they share the patients’ genotype, have proven to be a useful platform for in vitro investigation of the effect of pathogenic mutations of LQTS and VUS on the cardiac phenotype, and may represent the optimal tool, in combination with gene editing strategies, for large-scale investigation of the functional consequences of genetic variants.
  • Large precision medicine approaches could combine the benefits of large-scale genetic studies with reliable functional readouts operating at medium to high throughput.
  • Some of the current limitations of the hiPSC technology can be addressed only with combined and bidirectional efforts between clinicians and scientists.

References

  1. Schwartz PJ, Stramba-Badiale M, Crotti L, et al. Prevalence of the congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation 2009;120:1761–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  2. Schwartz PJ, Periti M, Malliani A. The long Q-T syndrome. Am Heart J 1975;89:378–90.
    Crossref | PubMed
  3. Crotti L, Kotta MC. The role of genetics in primary ventricular fibrillation, inherited channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. Int J Cardiol 2017;237:45–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  4. Schwartz PJ, Ackerman MJ. The long QT syndrome: a transatlantic clinical approach to diagnosis and therapy. Eur Heart J 2013;34:3109–16.
    Crossref | PubMed
  5. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Locati EH, et al. Long QT syndrome patients with mutations of the SCN5A and HERG genes have differential responses to Na+ channel blockade and to increases in heart rate. Implications for gene-specific therapy. Circulation 1995;92:3381–6
    PubMed
  6. Priori SG, Napolitano C, Schwartz PJ. Low penetrance in the long-QT syndrome: clinical impact. Circulation 1999;99:529–33.
    Crossref | PubMed
  7. Schwartz PJ, Crotti L, George AL. Modifier genes for sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3925–31.
    Crossref | PubMed
  8. Brink PA, Crotti L, Corfield V, et al. Phenotypic variability and unusual clinical severity of congenital long-QT syndrome in a founder population. Circulation 2005;112:2602–10.
    Crossref | PubMed
  9. Crotti L, Monti MC, Insolia R, et al. NOS1AP is a genetic modifier of the long-QT syndrome. Circulation 2009;120:1657–63.
    Crossref | PubMed
  10. Duchatelet S, Crotti L, Peat RA, et al. Identification of a KCNQ1 polymorphism acting as a protective modifier against arrhythmic risk in long-QT syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2013;6:354–61.
    Crossref | PubMed
  11. de Villiers CP, van der Merwe L, Crotti L, et al. AKAP9 is a genetic modifier of congenital long-QT syndrome type 1. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2014;7:599–606.
    Crossref | PubMed
  12. Chai S, Wan X, Ramirez-Navarro A, et al. Physiological genomics identifies genetic modifiers of long QT syndrome type 2 severity. J Clin Invest 2018;128:1043–56.
    Crossref | PubMed
  13. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–23.
    Crossref | PubMed
  14. Giudicessi JR, Ackerman MJ. Genotype- and phenotype-guided management of congenital long QT syndrome. Curr Probl Cardiol 2013;38:417–55.
    Crossref | PubMed
  15. Sala L, Hegyi B, Bartolucci C, et al. Action potential contour contributes to species differences in repolarization response to beta-adrenergic stimulation. Europace 2017;67:615.
    Crossref | PubMed
  16. Moretti A, Bellin M, Welling A, et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for Long-QT Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1397–409.
    Crossref | PubMed
  17. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006;126:663–76.
    Crossref | PubMed
  18. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007;131:861–72.
    Crossref | PubMed
  19. Denning C, Borgdorff V, Crutchley J, et al. Cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells: From laboratory curiosity to industrial biomedical platform. Biochim Biophys Acta 2016;1863:1728–48.
    Crossref | PubMed
  20. Loh Y-H, Agarwal S, Park I-H, et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human blood. Blood 2009;113:5476–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  21. Jouni M, Si-Tayeb K, Es-Salah-Lamoureux Z, et al. Toward personalized medicine: using cardiomyocytes differentiated from urine-derived pluripotent stem cells to recapitulate electrophysiological characteristics of type 2 Long QT Syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc 2015;4:e002159.
    Crossref | PubMed
  22. Verkerk AO, Veerman CC, Zegers JG, et al. Patch-clamp recording from human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: Improving action potential characteristics through dynamic clamp. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:pii:E1873
    Crossref | PubMed
  23. Lundy SD, Zhu W-Z, Regnier M, et al. Structural and functional maturation of cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2013;22:1991–2002.
    Crossref | PubMed
  24. Burridge PW, Matsa E, Shukla P, et al. Chemically defined generation of human cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods 2014;11:855–60.
    Crossref | PubMed
  25. Ribeiro MC, Tertoolen LG, Guadix JA, et al. Functional maturation of human pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes in vitro – Correlation between contraction force and electrophysiology. Biomaterials 2015;51:138–50.
    Crossref | PubMed
  26. van den Berg CW, Elliott DA, Braam SR, et al. Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cardiomyocytes under defined conditions. Methods Mol Biol 2016;1353:163–80.
    Crossref | PubMed
  27. Giacomelli E, Bellin M, Sala L, et al. Three-dimensional cardiac microtissues composed of cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells co-differentiated from human pluripotent stem cells. Development 2017;144:1008–17.
    Crossref | PubMed
  28. Mannhardt I, Breckwoldt K, Letuffe-Brenière D, et al. Human engineered heart tissue: analysis of contractile force. Stem Cell Reports 2016;7:29–42.
    Crossref | PubMed
  29. Nunes SS, Miklas JW, Liu J, et al. Biowire: a platform for maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods 2013;10:781–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  30. Ronaldson-Bouchard K, Ma SP, Yeager K, et al. Advanced maturation of human cardiac tissue grown from pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2018;556:239–43.
    Crossref | PubMed
  31. Kane C, Terracciano CM. Human cardiac fibroblasts engage the sarcoplasmic reticulum in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte excitation–contraction coupling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:1061–3.
    Crossref | PubMed
  32. Wilders R. Dynamic clamp: a powerful tool in cardiac electrophysiology. J Physiol 2006;576:349–59.
    Crossref | PubMed
  33. Rocchetti M, Sala L, Dreizehnter L, et al. Elucidating arrhythmogenic mechanisms of long-QT syndrome CALM1-F142L mutation in patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res 2017;113:531–41.
    Crossref | PubMed
  34. Meijer van Putten RME, Mengarelli I, Guan K, et al. Ion channelopathies in human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes: a dynamic clamp study with virtual IK1. Front Physiol 2015;6:7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  35. Horváth A, Lemoine MD, Löser A, et al. Low resting membrane potential and low inward rectifier potassium currents are not inherent features of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Reports 2018;10:822–33.
    Crossref | PubMed
  36. Sala L, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Tertoolen LGJ, et al. Electrophysiological analysis of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hPSC-CMs) using multi-electrode arrays (MEAs). J Vis Exp 2017.
    Crossref | PubMed
  37. Sager PT, Gintant G, Turner JR, et al. Rechanneling the cardiac proarrhythmia safety paradigm: A meeting report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium. Am Heart J 2014;167:292–300.
    Crossref | PubMed
  38. Shaheen N, Shiti A, Huber I, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac cell sheets expressing genetically encoded voltage indicator for pharmacological and arrhythmia studies. Stem Cell Reports 2018;10:1879–94.
    Crossref | PubMed
  39. Shinnawi R, Huber I, Maizels L, et al. Monitoring Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes with genetically encoded calcium and voltage fluorescent reporters. Stem Cell Reports 2015;5:582–96.
    Crossref | PubMed
  40. Dempsey GT, Chaudhary KW, Atwater N, et al. Cardiotoxicity screening with simultaneous optogenetic pacing, voltage imaging and calcium imaging. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2016;81:240–50.
    Crossref | PubMed
  41. Kijlstra JD, Hu D, Mittal N, et al. Integrated analysis of contractile kinetics, force generation, and electrical activity in single human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cell Reports 2015;5:1226–38.
    Crossref | PubMed
  42. Ribeiro AJS, Schwab O, Mandegar MA, et al. Multi-imaging method to assay the contractile mechanical output of micropatterned human iPSC-derived cardiac myocytes. Circ Res 2017;120:1572–83.
    Crossref | PubMed
  43. Sala L, van Meer BJ, Tertoolen LGJ, et al. MUSCLEMOTION: A versatile open software tool to quantify cardiomyocyte and cardiac muscle contraction in vitro and in vivo. Circ Res 2018;122:e5–16.
    Crossref | PubMed
  44. van Meer BJ, Sala L, Tertoolen LGJ, et al. Quantification of muscle contraction in vitro and in vivo using MUSCLEMOTION software: From stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes to zebrafish and human hearts. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2018;99:e67.
    Crossref | PubMed
  45. Kapplinger JD, Tester DJ, Salisbury BA, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of mutations from the first 2,500 consecutive unrelated patients referred for the FAMILION long QT syndrome genetic test. Heart Rhythm 2009;6:1297–303.
    Crossref | PubMed
  46. Schwartz PJ, Crotti L, Insolia R. Long-QT syndrome: from genetics to management. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol 2012;5:868–77.
    Crossref | PubMed
  47. Romano C, Gemme G, Pongiglione R. Rare cardiac arrhythmias of the pediatric age. Minerva Pediatr 1963;15:1155–64.
    PubMed
  48. Ward OC. A new familial cardiac syndrome in children. J Ir Med Assoc 1964;54:103–6.
    PubMed
  49. Jervell A, Lange-Nielsen F. Congenital deaf-mutism, functional heart disease with prolongation of the Q-T interval and sudden death. Am Heart J 1957;54:59–68.
    Crossref | PubMed
  50. Schwartz PJ, Spazzolini C, Crotti L, et al. The Jervell and Lange-Nielsen Syndrome. Circulation 2006;113:783–90.
    Crossref | PubMed
  51. Obreztchikova MN, Sosunov EA, Plotnikov A, et al. Developmental changes in IKr and IKs contribute to age-related expression of dofetilide effects on repolarization and proarrhythmia. Cardiovasc Res 2003;59:339–50.
    Crossref | PubMed
  52. Kasai-Brunswick THH, Silva Dos Santos D, Ferreira RPP, et al. Generation of patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell lines from one patient with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome, one with type 1 long QT syndrome and two healthy relatives. Stem Cell Res 2018;31:174–80.
    Crossref | PubMed
  53. Mura M, Ginevrino M, Zappatore R, et al. Generation of the human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) line PSMi003-A from a patient affected by an autosomal recessive form of Long QT Syndrome type 1. Stem Cell Res 2018;29:170–3.
    Crossref | PubMed
  54. Wuriyanghai Y, Makiyama T, Sasaki K, et al. Complex aberrant splicing in the induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes from a patient with long QT syndrome carrying KCNQ1-A344Aspl mutation. Heart Rhythm 2018;15:1566–74.
    Crossref | PubMed
  55. Zhang M, D’Aniello C, Verkerk AO, et al. Recessive cardiac phenotypes in induced pluripotent stem cell models of Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome: disease mechanisms and pharmacological rescue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:E5383--92.
    Crossref | PubMed
  56. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Spazzolini C, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmias. Circulation 2001;103:89–95.
    Crossref | PubMed
  57. Delisle BP, Anson BD, Rajamani S, et al. Biology of cardiac arrhythmias: ion channel protein trafficking. Circ Res 2004;94:1418–28.
    Crossref | PubMed
  58. Mehta A, Ramachandra CJA, Singh P, et al. Identification of a targeted and testable antiarrhythmic therapy for long-QT syndrome type 2 using a patient-specific cellular model. Eur Heart J 2018;39:1446–55.
    Crossref | PubMed
  59. Mehta A, Sequiera GL, Ramachandra CJA, et al. Re-trafficking of hERG reverses long QT syndrome 2 phenotype in human iPS-derived cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res 2014;102:497–506.
    Crossref | PubMed
  60. Matsa E, Dixon JE, Medway C, et al. Allele-specific RNA interference rescues the long-QT syndrome phenotype in human-induced pluripotency stem cell cardiomyocytes. Eur Heart J 2014;35:1078–87.
    Crossref | PubMed
  61. Bellin M, Casini S, Davis RP, et al. Isogenic human pluripotent stem cell pairs reveal the role of a KCNH2 mutation in long-QT syndrome. EMBO J 2013;32:3161–75.
    Crossref | PubMed
  62. Sala L, Yu Z, Ward-van Oostwaard D, et al. A new hERG allosteric modulator rescues genetic and drug-induced long-QT syndrome phenotypes in cardiomyocytes from isogenic pairs of patient induced pluripotent stem cells. EMBO Mol Med 2016;8:1065–81.
    Crossref | PubMed
  63. Terrenoire C, Wang K, Tung KWC, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells used to reveal drug actions in a long QT syndrome family with complex genetics. J Gen Physiol 2013;141:61–72.
    Crossref | PubMed
  64. Lahti AL, Kujala VJ, Chapman H, et al. Model for long QT syndrome type 2 using human iPS cells demonstrates arrhythmogenic characteristics in cell culture. Dis Model Mech 2012;5:220–30.
    Crossref | PubMed
  65. Itzhaki I, Maizels L, Huber I, et al. Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2011;471:225–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  66. Spencer CI, Baba S, Nakamura K, et al. Calcium transients closely reflect prolonged action potentials in iPSC models of inherited cardiac arrhythmia. Stem Cell Reports 2014;3:269–81.
    Crossref | PubMed
  67. Mura M, Mehta A, Ramachandra CJ, et al. The KCNH2 -IVS9-28A/G mutation causes aberrant isoform expression and hERG trafficking defect in cardiomyocytes derived from patients affected by Long QT Syndrome type 2. Int J Cardiol 2017;240:367–71.
    Crossref | PubMed
  68. Fatima A, Ivanyuk D, Herms S, et al. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cell line from a patient with a long QT syndrome type 2. Stem Cell Res 2016;16:304–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  69. Matsa E, Rajamohan D, Dick E, et al. Drug evaluation in cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells carrying a long QT syndrome type 2 mutation. Eur Heart J 2011;32:952–62.
    Crossref | PubMed
  70. Anderson CL, Delisle BP, Anson BD, et al. Most LQT2 Mutations reduce Kv11.1 (hERG) current by a class 2 (trafficking-deficient) mechanism. Circulation 2006;113:365–73.
    Crossref | PubMed
  71. Schwartz PJ, Gnecchi M, Dagradi F, et al. From patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells to clinical translation in Long QT Syndrome type 2. Eur Heart J 2019.
    Crossref | PubMed
  72. Zaza A, Belardinelli L, Shryock JC. Pathophysiology and pharmacology of the cardiac ‘late sodium current’. Pharmacol Ther 2008;119:326–39.
    Crossref | PubMed
  73. Rizzetto R, Rocchetti M, Sala L, et al. Late sodium current (INaL) in pancreatic β-cells. Pflügers Arch – Eur J Physiol 2015;467:1757–68.
    Crossref | PubMed
  74. Ma D, Wei H, Zhao Y, et al. Modeling type 3 long QT syndrome with cardiomyocytes derived from patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:5277–86.
    Crossref | PubMed
  75. Okata S, Yuasa S, Suzuki T, et al. Embryonic type Na+ channel β-subunit, SCN3B masks the disease phenotype of Brugada syndrome. Sci Rep 2016;6:34198.
    Crossref | PubMed
  76. Malan D, Zhang M, Stallmeyer B, et al. Human iPS cell model of type 3 long QT syndrome recapitulates drug-based phenotype correction. Basic Res Cardiol 2016;111:11–4.
    Crossref | PubMed
  77. Fatima A, Kaifeng S, Dittmann S, et al. The disease-specific phenotype in cardiomyocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells of two long QT syndrome type 3 patients. PLoS One 2013;8:e83005.
    Crossref | PubMed
  78. Portero V, Casini S, Hoekstra M, et al. Anti-arrhythmic potential of the late sodium current inhibitor GS-458967 in murine Scn5a-1798insD+/− and human SCN5A-1795insD+/− iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc Res 2017;113:829–38.
    Crossref | PubMed
  79. Badone B, Ronchi C, Kotta M-C, et al. Calmodulinopathy: functional effects of CALM mutations and their relationship with clinical phenotypes. Front Cardiovasc Med 2018;5:176.
    Crossref | PubMed
  80. Crotti L, Johnson CN, Graf E, et al. Calmodulin mutations associated with recurrent cardiac arrest in infants. Circulation 2013;127:1009–17.
    Crossref | PubMed
  81. Yamamoto Y, Makiyama T, Harita T, et al. Allele-specific ablation rescues electrophysiological abnormalities in a human iPS cell model of long-QT syndrome with a CALM2 mutation. Hum Mol Genet 2017;26:1670–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  82. Limpitikul WB, Dick IE, Tester DJ, et al. A precision medicine approach to the rescue of function on malignant calmodulinopathic Long-QT Syndrome. Circ Res 2017;120:39–48.
    Crossref | PubMed
  83. Wu X, Bers DM. Free and bound intracellular calmodulin measurements in cardiac myocytes. Cell Calcium 2007;41:353–64.
    Crossref | PubMed
  84. Maier LS, Ziolo MT, Bossuyt J, et al. Dynamic changes in free Ca-calmodulin levels in adult cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2006;41:451–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  85. Crotti L, Spazzolini C, Tester DJ, et al. Calmodulin mutations and life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias: Insights from the International Calmodulinopathy Registry. Eur Heart J (In press).
  86. Webster G, Schoppen ZJ, George AL. Treatment of calmodulinopathy with verapamil. BMJ Case Rep 2017;2017: pii: bcr-2017-220568.
    Crossref | PubMed
  87. Liang P, Sallam K, Wu H, et al. Patient-specific and genome-edited induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes elucidate single-cell phenotype of Brugada syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2086–96.
    Crossref | PubMed
  88. Kilpinen H, Goncalves A, Leha A, et al. Common genetic variation drives molecular heterogeneity in human iPSCs. Nature 2017;546:370–5.
    Crossref | PubMed
  89. Sala L, Bellin M, Mummery CL. Integrating cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells in safety pharmacology: Has the time come? Br J Pharmacol 2017;174:3749–65.
    Crossref | PubMed
  90. Urnov FD, Rebar EJ, Holmes MC, et al. Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:636–46.
    Crossref | PubMed
  91. Mussolino C, Morbitzer R, Lütge F, et al. A novel TALE nuclease scaffold enables high genome editing activity in combination with low toxicity. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:9283–93.
    Crossref | PubMed
  92. Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 2014;157:1262–78.
    Crossref | PubMed
  93. Freedman LP, Gibson MC, Ethier SP, et al. Reproducibility: changing the policies and culture of cell line authentication. Nat Methods 2015;12:493–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  94. Wang Y, Liang P, Lan F, et al. Genome editing of isogenic human induced pluripotent stem cells recapitulates long QT phenotype for drug testing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:451–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  95. Ma N, Zhang JZ, Itzhaki I, et al. Determining the pathogenicity of a genomic variant of uncertain significance using CRISPR/Cas9 and human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation 2018;138:2666–81.
    Crossref | PubMed
  96. Schwartz PJ, Sala L. Precision vs traditional medicine. Clinical questions trigger progress in basic science: a favor not always returned. Circ Res 2019;124:459–61.
    Crossref | PubMed
  97. Gnecchi M, Stefanello M, Mura M. Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: Toward the future of cardiac arrhythmias. Int J Cardiol 2017;237:49–52.
    Crossref | PubMed
Previous Volume Article Next Volume Article